Re: [BUGS] signal 11 segfaults with parallel workers
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUGS] signal 11 segfaults with parallel workers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 694.1501472481@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [BUGS] signal 11 segfaults with parallel workers (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [BUGS] signal 11 segfaults with parallel workers
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> writes: > There is already a "Parallel Worker" memory context defined by that > time. I think the issue is that multicorn library expects that > Transaction context to be defined by that time. It looks like multicorn supposes that a library's _PG_init function can only be called inside a transaction. That is broken with a capital B. We need not consider parallel query to find counterexamples: that means you can't preload multicorn using shared_preload_libraries, as that loads libraries into the postmaster, which never has and never will run transactions. Whatever it's trying to initialize in _PG_init needs to be done later. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: