Re: 500x speed-down: Wrong query plan?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 500x speed-down: Wrong query plan? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6914.1136833010@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 500x speed-down: Wrong query plan? (Alessandro Baretta <a.baretta@barettadeit.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: 500x speed-down: Wrong statistics!
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Alessandro Baretta <a.baretta@barettadeit.com> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> I'm curious to see how many rows the planner thinks this will produce, >> and whether it will use the index or not. > dmd-freerp-1-alex=# EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT * FROM articolo WHERE > articolo.xdbs_modified > '2006-01-08 18:25:00+01'; > QUERY PLAN > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Index Scan using articolo_modified_index on articolo (cost=0.00..3914.91 > rows=17697 width=653) (actual time=0.032..0.032 rows=0 loops=1) > Index Cond: (xdbs_modified > '2006-01-08 18:25:00'::timestamp without time zone) > Total runtime: 0.150 ms > (3 rows) Well, there's your problem: 17697 rows estimated vs 0 actual. With a closer row estimate it would've probably done the right thing for the join problem. How many rows are really in the table, anyway? Could we see the pg_stats row for articolo.xdbs_modified? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: