Re: Mnogosearch (Was: Re: website doc search is ... )
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Mnogosearch (Was: Re: website doc search is ... ) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 691.1072996030@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Mnogosearch (Was: Re: website doc search is ... ) ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Mnogosearch (Was: Re: website doc search is ... )
Re: Mnogosearch (Was: Re: website doc search is ... ) |
Список | pgsql-general |
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes: > On Thu, 1 Jan 2004, Tom Lane wrote: >> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes: >>> what sort of impact does CLUSTER have on the system? For instance, an >>> index happens nightly, so I'm guessing that I'll have to CLUSTER each >>> right after? >> >> Depends; what does the "index" process do --- are ndict8 and friends >> rebuilt from scratch? > nope, but heavily updated ... basically, the indexer looks at url for what > urls need to be 're-indexed' ... if it does, it removed all words from the > ndict# tables that belong to that url, and re-adds accordingly ... Hmm, but in practice only a small fraction of the pages on the site change in any given day, no? I'd think the typical nightly run changes only a small fraction of the entries in the tables, if it is smart enough not to re-index pages that did not change. My guess is that it'd be enough to re-cluster once a week or so. But this is pointless speculation until we find out whether clustering helps enough to make it worth maintaining clustered-ness at all. Did you get any results yet? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: