Re: Remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age
| От | Josh Berkus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 6907f5e0-19de-2aac-ac70-68a56ae781f4@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/12/2016 05:00 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: >> Given that hot_standby_feedback is pretty bulletproof now, and a lot of >> the work in reducing replay conflicts, I think the utility of >> vacuum_defer_cleanup_age is at an end. I really meant so submit a patch >> to remove it to 9.6, but it got away from me. >> >> Any objections to removing the option in 10? > > I'm not sure I see the point. Redusing the number of configuration variables is an a-priori good. In aggregate, the more knobs we have, the harder it is to learn how to admin Postgres. Therefore any time a config variable becomes obsolete, we should remove it. -- -- Josh Berkus Red Hat OSAS (any opinions are my own)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: