Re: small parallel restore optimization
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: small parallel restore optimization |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6902.1236561560@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: small parallel restore optimization (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > I have found the source of the problem I saw. dumputils.c:fmtId() uses a > static PQExpBuffer which it initialises the first time it's called. This > gets clobbered by simultaneous calls by Windows threads. Ugh. But that doesn't explain the original trouble report on Unixware. > I could just make it auto and set it up on each call, but that could > result in a non-trivial memory leak ... it's probably called a great > many times. Or I could provide a parallel version where we pass in a > PQExpBuffer that we create, one per thread, and is used by anything > called by the parallel code. That seems like a bit of a potential > footgun, though. I think we should try hard to keep this localized to fmtId(), rather than changing the callers --- the latter would be a huge readability hit. Is there a reasonable way to have fmtId use thread-local storage for its PQExpBuffer pointer on Windows? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: