Re: foreign table batch inserts
От | Etsuro Fujita |
---|---|
Тема | Re: foreign table batch inserts |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 68df64a5-328f-b571-6d0b-9573280ae931@lab.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: foreign table batch inserts (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: foreign table batch inserts
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2016/05/18 7:08, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 6:00 AM, Manuel Kniep <m.kniep@web.de> wrote: >> I realized that inserts into foreign tables are only done row by row. >> Consider copying data from one local table to a foreign table with >> >> INSERT INTO foreign_table(a,b,c) SELECT a,b,c FROM local_table; >> >> When the foreign server is for example in another datacenter with long latency, >> this as an enormous performance trade off. > I am adding Fujita-san in the loop here, he is > quite involved with postgres_fdw these days so perhaps he has some > input to offer. Honestly, I didn't have any idea for executing such an insert efficiently, but I was thinking to execute an insert into a foreign table efficiently, by sending the whole insert to the remote server, if possible. For example, if the insert is of the form: INSERT INTO foreign_table(a,b,c) VALUES (1, 2, 3), (4, 5, 6) or INSERT INTO foreign_table(a,b,c) SELECT a,b,c FROM foreign_table2 where foreign_table and foreign_table2 belong to the same foreign server, then we could send the whole insert to the remote server. Wouldn't that make sense? Best regards, Etsuro Fujita
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: