Re: PG vs ElasticSearch for Logs
От | Thomas Güttler |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PG vs ElasticSearch for Logs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 68cf54f1-b9bd-7e35-7ab8-00a57105b79c@thomas-guettler.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PG vs ElasticSearch for Logs (Andreas Kretschmer <akretschmer@spamfence.net>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Am 19.08.2016 um 12:44 schrieb Andreas Kretschmer: > Thomas Güttler <guettliml@thomas-guettler.de> wrote: > >>> How will you be using the logs? What kind of queries? What kind of searches? >>> Correlating events and logs from various sources could be really easy with joins, count and summary operations. >> >> Wishes raise with possibilities. First I want to do simple queries about >> hosts and timestamps. Then some simple substring matches. > > for append-only tables like this consider 9.5 and BRIN-Indexes for > timestamp-searches. But if you deletes after N weeks BRIN shouldn't work > properly because of vacuum and re-use of space within the table. > Do you know BRIN? > > So, in your case, consider partitioning, maybe per month. So you can > also avoid mess with table and index bloat. Thank you very much for these hints. I did not know BRIN before. > Greetings from Dresden to Chemnitz (is this still valid?) Yes, I am in Chemnitz/Germany. Everything (kids, wife, friends, sports, job) is fine. I hope the same with you? Regards, Thomas Güttler -- Thomas Guettler http://www.thomas-guettler.de/
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: