Re: Relative security of Community repos and packages
От | Christophe Pettus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Relative security of Community repos and packages |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 68B44B4E-1C13-4262-9F6F-C79601C72102@thebuild.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Relative security of Community repos and packages ("pbj@cmicdo.com" <pbj@cmicdo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Relative security of Community repos and packages
|
Список | pgsql-www |
> On Jul 28, 2021, at 11:26, pbj@cmicdo.com wrote: > Currently involved in a discussion about security of Postgres packages from various sources. I'm strongly advocating thatwe get our packages directly from PGDG. > > Would Postgres packages from Red Hat repos (and I guess we could include EDB, 2nd Quadrant, Crunchy...) be considered moresecure from being hacked than those from the PGDG repos? While I have nothing bad to say about the other repo sources, every other repo (AFAIK) pulls from the community repos, sothere's no reason that they would be *more* security than the community sources. The Infra team takes build chain andhosting security very seriously, and I would say that you are as safe with the community repos as you would be with anyother source.
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: