Re: SMP scaling
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SMP scaling |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6871.1111160304@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | SMP scaling (Mark Rae <mrae@purplebat.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: SMP scaling
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Mark Rae <mrae@purplebat.com> writes: > Ok, I've done the tests comparing 8.0.1 against a snapshot from the 16th > and the results are impressive. > Clients 1 2 3 4 6 8 12 16 32 64 > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Altix pg-8.0.1 1.00 2.02 2.98 3.97 5.87 7.23 7.51 5.54 4.68 5.10 > Altix pg-20050316 1.00 1.97 2.86 3.68 5.29 6.90 9.00 9.88 10.03 9.94 > AMD64 pg-8.0.1 1.00 1.87 2.77 3.34 2.73 2.57 2.58 2.62 > AMD64 pg-20050316 1.00 1.95 2.84 3.69 3.61 3.66 3.70 3.69 > IA64 pg-8.0.1 1.00 1.97 2.91 3.82 2.91 2.92 2.94 2.98 > IA64 pg-20050316 1.00 1.98 2.95 3.87 3.80 3.78 3.86 3.90 Hey, that looks pretty sweet. One thing this obscures though is whether there is any change in the single-client throughput rate --- ie, is "1.00" better or worse for CVS tip vs 8.0.1? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: