multi-tenant vs. multi-cluster

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ben Chobot
Тема multi-tenant vs. multi-cluster
Дата
Msg-id 686F095E-6ECF-45FA-B78A-F3D29D368585@silentmedia.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: multi-tenant vs. multi-cluster  (Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>)
Список pgsql-general
We're considering using postgres as a way to host database services for many, many independent applications. One
obviousway to do this is with schemas, roles, and proper permissions, but that still leaves open the possibility for
somepoorly written application to leave open transactions and affect others.  

Another possible way to go is to use debian's ability to easily run multiple clusters, but while this option gives
betterisolation, I imaging it comes at a cost of more overhead, both in terms of memory and in terms of support. I
supposemy question is, how much overhead? I'm less worried about support (that's what scripts are for) but if we're
talkingan extra 50MB of memory per cluster, that will start to add up. 

How have you guys offered multi-tenant postgres services? Am I forgetting something?

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Merlin Moncure
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: query taking much longer since Postgres 8.4 upgrade
Следующее
От: Ivan Voras
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: multi-tenant vs. multi-cluster