Re: SQL/JSON: functions
От | Nikita Glukhov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SQL/JSON: functions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6862ba8f-70bf-6dd8-5651-5d9050c8f4de@postgrespro.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | SQL/JSON: functions (Nikita Glukhov <n.gluhov@postgrespro.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: SQL/JSON: functions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Attached 13th version of the patches: * Subtransactions in PG_TRY/CATCH in ExecEvalJsonExpr() were made unconditional, regardless of the volatility of expressions. * PG_TRY/CATCH in ExecEvalExprPassingCaseValue() was removed along with the entire function.
On 15.03.2018 11:08, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
On 14 Mar 2018 17:11, "Alexander Korotkov" <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 2:10 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:On 2018-03-14 07:54:35 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 04:08:01PM +0300, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> > The docs are here
> > https://github.com/obartunov/sqljsondoc/blob/master/README.j sonpath.md
> >
> > It's not easy to write docs for SQL/JSON in xml, so I decided to write in more
> > friendly way. We'll have time to convert it to postgres format.
>
> If you aim at getting a feature committed first without its
> documentation, and getting the docs written after the feature freeze
> using a dedicated open item or such, this is much acceptable in my
> opinion and the CF is running short in time.
Given that this patch still uses PG_TRY/CATCH around as wide paths of
code as a whole ExecEvalExpr() invocation,I agree that we should either use PG_TRY/CATCH over some small and safecodepaths or surround PG_TRY/CATCH with subtransactions. PG_TRY/CATCH overExecEvalExpr() looks really unacceptable.basically has gotten no
review, I don't see this going anywhere for v11.I wouldn't be co categorical at this point. Patchset is there for about year.Some parts of code received more of review while some parts receives less.We can surround all dangerous PG_TRY/CATCH pairs with subtransactions,tolerate performance penalty and leave further optimizations for future releases.Agree it's not difficult.In worst case, we can remove codepaths which use PG_TRY/CATCH andleave only ERROR ON ERROR behavior of SQL/JSON.No-no, json user will be really upset on this. Our goal is to be the first relational database with strong standard compliance.
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: