Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan
От | Markus Bertheau |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 684362e10802080119i5be31792w8b8656a8eaba289@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan ("Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2008/2/8, Heikki Linnakangas <<a href="mailto:heikki@enterprisedb.com">heikki@enterprisedb.com</a>>:<br />> GregoryStark wrote:<br />> > git or its ilk would impact the lives of submitters and reviewers most.<br /> > >Basically it would allow two non-committers to collaborate, something which we<br />> > can't really do effectivelynow.<br />> <br />> Two git-using non-committers can do that already, regardless of the<br /> > masterrepository.<br /><br /><br />Maybe the existing SVN, git and other mirrors could just become more official and supportedin the sense that users can rely on them to be updated often enough? At the moment what is there are some linkson <a href="http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/Working_with_CVS#Other_versions_of_the_PostgreSQL_Repository">http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/Working_with_CVS#Other_versions_of_the_PostgreSQL_Repository</a> andno indication of how reliable these repositories are. I suppos that a lot of reason for discussion would disappear ifthese repositories were made official and supported.<br /><br />Markus<br />
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: