Re: [HACKERS] the need to finish
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] the need to finish |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6843.1492010801@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [HACKERS] the need to finish (Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] the need to finish
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl> writes: > Logical replication emits logmessages like these: > DETAIL: 90 transactions need to finish. > DETAIL: 87 transactions need to finish. > DETAIL: 70 transactions need to finish. > Could we get rid of that 'need'? It strikes me as a bit off; something > that people would say but not a mechanical message by a computer. I > dislike it strongly. > I would prefer the line to be more terse: > DETAIL: 90 transactions to finish. > Am I the only one who is annoyed by this phrase? Our style guidelines say that detail messages should be complete sentences, so I don't like your proposal too much. Maybe "N transactions remain to finish." ? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: