Re: Push down more full joins in postgres_fdw
От | Etsuro Fujita |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Push down more full joins in postgres_fdw |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 681cabd2-72f0-0e0b-c71c-4e09fe0efe5e@lab.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Push down more full joins in postgres_fdw (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Push down more full joins in postgres_fdw
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2016/12/07 5:27, Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 6:20 AM, Ashutosh Bapat > <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> 4. I am still not happy with this change >> + /* >> + * Since (1) the expressions in foreignrel's reltarget doesn't contain >> + * any PHVs and (2) foreignrel's local_conds is empty, the tlist >> + * created by build_tlist_to_deparse must be one-to-one with the >> + * expressions. >> + */ >> + Assert(list_length(tlist) == >> list_length(foreignrel->reltarget->exprs)); >> the assertion only checks that the number of elements in both the lists are >> same but does not check whether those lists are same i.e. they contain the same >> elements in the same order. This equality is crucial to deparsing logic. If >> somehow build_tlist_to_deparse() breaks that assumption in future, we have no >> way to detect it, unless a regression test fails. > If there's an easy way to do a more exact comparison, great. Ashutosh proposed this to do the comparison: On 2016/11/22 18:28, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: > I guess, the reason why you are doing it this way, is SELECT clause for the > outermost query gets deparsed before FROM clause. For later we call > deparseRangeTblRef(), which builds the tlist. So, while deparsing SELECT > clause, we do not have tlist to build from. In that case, I guess, we have to > build the tlist in get_subselect_alias_id() if it's not available and stick it > in fpinfo. Subsequent calls to get_subselect_alias_id() should find tlist > there. Then in deparseRangeTblRef() assert that there's a tlist in fpinfo > and use it to build the SELECT clause of subquery. That way, we don't build > tlist unless it's needed and also use the same tlist for all searches. Please > use tlist_member() to search into the tlist. This would probably work, but seems to me a bit complicated. Instead, I'd like to propose that we build the tlist for each relation being deparsed as a subquery in a given join tree, right before deparsing the SELECT clause in deparseSelectStmtForRel, if is_subquery is false and lower_subquery_rels isn't NULL, and store the tlist into the relation's fpinfo. That would allow us to build the tlist only when we need it, and to use tlist_member for the exact comparison. I think it would be much easier to implement that. Best regards, Etsuro Fujita
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: