Re: [HACKERS] createlang/droplang deprecated
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] createlang/droplang deprecated |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 680.1489850956@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] createlang/droplang deprecated (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] createlang/droplang deprecated
Re: [HACKERS] createlang/droplang deprecated |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: >> 2017-03-18 14:00 GMT+01:00 Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>: >>> I just noticed that createlang and droplang have been listed as >>> deprecated since PG 9.1. >>> Do we dare remove them? > (I'd extend it to all the non-prefixed pg binaries, but let's open that can > of worms right now, one thing at a time) To my mind, these two and createuser/dropuser are the only really serious namespacing problems among our standard binaries. The ones with names ending in "db" don't seem likely to cause huge confusion. I suppose that if we were naming it today, "psql" wouldn't get that name; but the chances of renaming that one are certainly zero, namespace conflict or no. But createuser/dropuser are a real problem, because they certainly could be mistaken for system-level utilities. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: