Re: pg_upgrade vs. pg_dump
От | Stéphane Wirtel |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_upgrade vs. pg_dump |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 67A7D71F-28F7-4280-9EFF-8A92169AF9A1@wirtel.be обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pg_upgrade vs. pg_dump ("Perry, Hemy" <hemy_perry@mentor.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_upgrade vs. pg_dump
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
On 20 Jan 2015, at 20:22, Perry, Hemy wrote: > Hello, > > I am planning a migration from 9.1.7 to 9.4.0. > Based on my understanding, the recommendation is to use pg_upgrade > over 'dump and restore'. > Is that right? You can compile the twice versions of PostgreSQL on the same computer and just execute the upgrade with pg_upgrade and the right parameters. > > If I want to use pg_upgrade, I need to provide the -b bindir > (--old-bindir=bindir) and so my second question is what if I'll > provide 9.4 (the new PostgreSQL executable directory) also as the > 'old-bindir', can it work that way? Always? > [I am trying to solve a problem that I might not have the old-bindir > available on the machine and only the new-bindir will be available (as > well as the old & new datadir of course :)] > > Thanks > Hemy -- Stéphane Wirtel - http://wirtel.be - @matrixise
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: