Re: doc pg_constraint.convalidated column description need update
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: doc pg_constraint.convalidated column description need update |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 673e9806-1849-40c8-9a70-8a3bded3dc81@eisentraut.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: doc pg_constraint.convalidated column description need update (Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 09.06.25 16:32, Robert Treat wrote: > On Mon, Jun 9, 2025 at 12:00 AM jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 4:47 AM Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net> wrote: >>> >>> I think some of those changes are worth a second stab, so here is an >>> updated patch which removes the ancillary tagging and corresponding >>> line wrappings and focuses just on the wording/grammer improvements; >>> hopefully it will be easier to make sense of. >>> >> >> hi. >> >> <para> >> - Scanning a large table to verify a new foreign key or check constraint >> + Scanning a large table to verify new foreign key, check, or not >> null constraints >> can take a long time, and other updates to the table are locked out >> until the <command>ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT</command> command is >> committed. The main purpose of the <literal>NOT VALID</literal> >> >> here, it should be "not-null constraints"? >> Other than that, it looks good to me > > Thanks for taking a look, and yes, I believe you are correct. committed
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: