Re: cutting out the middleperl
От | Steve Atkins |
---|---|
Тема | Re: cutting out the middleperl |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6711CF45-7EF0-468D-90EF-5AC2C1EC2275@blighty.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: cutting out the middleperl (Aidan Van Dyk <aidan@highrise.ca>) |
Ответы |
Re: cutting out the middleperl
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Mar 27, 2007, at 7:34 AM, Aidan Van Dyk wrote: > Kev wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> I'm still in the design phase of a project. I was just wondering if >> anyone has any thoughts or experience on the idea of cutting the P >> out >> of the LAMP (or in my case, WAMP for now) stack. What I mean is >> having >> everything encapsulated into sql (or plpgsql or plperl where needed) >> functions stored in the pgsql server, and have Apache communicate >> with >> pgsql via a tiny C program that pretty much just checks whether the >> incoming function is on the allowed list and has the proper data >> types, >> then passes it straight in. Any errors are logged as potential >> security >> breaches. > > Sounds something like mod_libpq: > http://asmith.id.au/mod_libpq.html Or SQL-on-rails http://www.sqlonrails.org/ Cheers, Steve
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: