Re: [HACKERS] static assertions in C++
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] static assertions in C++ |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 66c291ff-8b53-d240-ea7f-3370372bfd39@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] static assertions in C++ (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/20/17 10:51, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> On 12/20/17 00:57, Tom Lane wrote: >>> I do not have a well-informed opinion on whether >>> #if defined(__cpp_static_assert) && __cpp_static_assert >= 200410 >>> is an appropriate test for static_assert() being available, but I'm >>> pretty suspicious of it because none of my C++ compilers seem to >>> take that path, not even recent stuff like clang 9.0.0. > >> For clang, you apparently need to pass -std=c++11 or higher. With g++ >>> =6, that's the default. > > Ah. I did try -std=c++0x on one machine, but forgot to do so with > the newer clang. That does seem to make it take the static_assert > path on recent macOS. committed -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: