Re: commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose
От | Erik Rijkers |
---|---|
Тема | Re: commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 66bbb685-7ab2-b01d-ed06-1a39c8078034@xs4all.nl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | commitfest.postgresql.org is no longer fit for purpose (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Op 5/16/24 om 20:30 schreef Robert Haas: > Hi, > > The original intent of CommitFests, and of commitfest.postgresql.org > by extension, was to provide a place where patches could be registered > to indicate that they needed to be reviewed, thus enabling patch > authors and patch reviewers to find each other in a reasonably > efficient way. I don't think it's working any more. I spent a good Hi, Perhaps it would be an idea to let patches 'expire' automatically unless they are 'rescued' (=given another year) by committer or commitfest manager (or perhaps a somewhat wider group - but not too many). Expiration after, say, one year should force patch-authors to mount a credible defense for his/her patch to either get his work rescued or reinstated/resubmitted. Just a thought that has crossed my mind already a few times. It's not very sympathetic but it might work keep the list smaller. Erik Rijkers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: