Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning
От | Tomas Vondra |
---|---|
Тема | Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 668eb809-cf43-4d93-b1a7-04d9f865960b@vondra.me обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 5/20/25 05:06, Tom Lane wrote: > Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> writes: >> Pushed after some tweaks to comments and the test case. > > My attention was drawn to commit 525392d57 after observing that > Valgrind complained about a memory leak in some code that commit added > to BuildCachedPlan(). I tried to make sense of said code so I could > remove the leak, and eventually arrived at the attached patch, which > is part of a series of leak-fixing things hence the high sequence > number. > > Unfortunately, the bad things I speculated about in the added comments > seem to be reality. The second attached file is a test case that > triggers > > ... FYI I added this as a PG18 open item: https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_18_Open_Items regards -- Tomas Vondra
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: