Re: Shouldn't jsonpath .string() Unwrap?
От | Chapman Flack |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Shouldn't jsonpath .string() Unwrap? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 666BA2F8.6030707@acm.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Shouldn't jsonpath .string() Unwrap? (David E. Wheeler <david@justatheory.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Shouldn't jsonpath .string() Unwrap?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/13/24 18:45, David E. Wheeler wrote: > On Jun 13, 2024, at 3:53 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote: > >> Hmm. You might be right. Many of these items have this code, but the string() branch does not: >> if (unwrap && JsonbType(jb) == jbvArray) >> return executeItemUnwrapTargetArray(cxt, jsp, jb, found, >> false); > > Exactly, would be pretty easy to add. I can work up a patch this weekend. My opinion is yes, that should be done. 9.46, umm, General Rule 11 g ii 6) A) says just "if MODE is lax and <JSON method> is not type or size, then let BASE be Unwrap(BASE)." No special exemption there for string(), nor further below at C) XV) for the operation of string(). Regards, -Chap
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: