Re: Rejecting weak passwords
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Rejecting weak passwords |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6629.1255968727@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Rejecting weak passwords (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Rejecting weak passwords
Re: Rejecting weak passwords |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 14:54 +0200, Albe Laurenz wrote: >> I guess I misunderstood something there, but I had assumed that the >> checkbox item read something like: "Does the product offer password >> policy enforcement?" (to quote Dave Page). > The answer to that is currently "Yes, with external tools". Using the > plugin approach, the answer will remain "Yes, with external tools". So > we wouldn't gain much. Except that your first statement is false. It is not possible currently for any tool to prevent someone from doing ALTER USER joe PASSWORD joe. A server-side plugin can provide a guarantee that there are no bad passwords (for some value of bad, and with some possible adverse consequences). We don't have that today. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: