Re: psql's FETCH_COUNT (cursor) is not being respected for CTEs
От | Alexander Lakhin |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psql's FETCH_COUNT (cursor) is not being respected for CTEs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 65cb266f-cfb8-9195-5398-5dcc93bec13e@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: psql's FETCH_COUNT (cursor) is not being respected for CTEs (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: psql's FETCH_COUNT (cursor) is not being respected for CTEs
Re: psql's FETCH_COUNT (cursor) is not being respected for CTEs |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
08.04.2024 18:08, Tom Lane wrote: > Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com> writes: >> Now that ExecQueryUsingCursor() is gone, it's not clear, what does >> the following comment mean:? >> * We must turn off gexec_flag to avoid infinite recursion. Note that >> * this allows ExecQueryUsingCursor to be applied to the individual query >> * results. > Hmm, the point about recursion is still valid isn't it? I agree the > reference to ExecQueryUsingCursor is obsolete, but I think we need to > reconstruct what this comment is actually talking about. It's > certainly pretty obscure ... Sorry, I wasn't clear enough, I meant to remove only that reference, not the quoted comment altogether. Best regards, Alexander
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: