On 12/27/23 12:37, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> Em ter., 26 de dez. de 2023 às 19:07, Tomas Vondra
> <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com <mailto:tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>>
> escreveu:
>
>
>
> On 12/26/23 19:10, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The commit b437571
> <http://b437571714707bc6466abde1a0af5e69aaade09c
> <http://b437571714707bc6466abde1a0af5e69aaade09c>> I
> > think has an oversight.
> > When allocate memory and initialize private spool in function:
> > _brin_leader_participate_as_worker
> >
> > The behavior is the bs_spool (heap and index fields)
> > are left empty.
> >
> > The code affected is:
> > buildstate->bs_spool = (BrinSpool *) palloc0(sizeof(BrinSpool));
> > - buildstate->bs_spool->heap = buildstate->bs_spool->heap;
> > - buildstate->bs_spool->index = buildstate->bs_spool->index;
> > + buildstate->bs_spool->heap = heap;
> > + buildstate->bs_spool->index = index;
> >
> > Is the fix correct?
> >
>
> Thanks for noticing this.
>
> You're welcome.
>
>
> Yes, I believe this is a bug - the assignments
> are certainly wrong, it leaves the fields set to NULL.
>
> I wonder how come this didn't fail during testing. Surely, if the leader
> participates as a worker, the tuplesort_begin_index_brin shall be called
> with heap/index being NULL, leading to some failure during the sort. But
> maybe this means we don't actually need the heap/index fields, it's just
> a copy of TuplesortIndexArg, but BRIN does not need that because we sort
> the tuples by blkno, and we don't need the descriptors for that.
>
> Unfortunately I can't test on Windows, since I can't build with meson on
> Windows.
>
>
> In any case, the _brin_parallel_scan_and_build does not actually need
> the separate heap/index arguments, those are already in the spool.
>
> Yeah, for sure.
>
>
> I'll try to figure out if we want to simplify the tuplesort or remove
> the arguments from _brin_parallel_scan_and_build.
>
Here is a patch simplifying the BRIN parallel create code a little bit.
As I suspected, we don't need the heap/index in the spool at all, and we
don't need to pass it to tuplesort_begin_index_brin either - we only
need blkno, and we have that in the datum1 field. This also means we
don't need TuplesortIndexBrinArg.
I'll push this tomorrow, probably.
regards
--
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company