Re: page 1 of relation global/11787 was uninitialized
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: page 1 of relation global/11787 was uninitialized |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6594.1365528881@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: page 1 of relation global/11787 was uninitialized ("Stephen R. van den Berg" <srb@cuci.nl>) |
Ответы |
Re: page 1 of relation global/11787 was uninitialized
Re: page 1 of relation global/11787 was uninitialized |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Stephen R. van den Berg" <srb@cuci.nl> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> It's conceivable that updating to something more current than 9.0.4 >> would get you out of this --- we've fixed quite a number of WAL replay >> bugs in the last two years. > I see that there is a 9.0.13, but that would be a source upgrade, since Debian > doesn't provide later than 9.0.4 AFAICS. That's a bit hard to believe, especially given that 9.0.13 fixes a rather major security bug. Any packager that isn't offering something more current than 9.0.4 is *seriously* misfeasant. > I suppose upgrading to 9.1.9 is not recommended in this state, or is it? You can't -- only a 9.0.x server will even try to start up against this DB. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: