Re: FSM rewrite committed, loose ends
| От | Gurjeet Singh |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: FSM rewrite committed, loose ends |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 65937bea0809300545t9476c3dv489c34860e6fbac3@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: FSM rewrite committed, loose ends (Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: FSM rewrite committed, loose ends
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com> wrote:
You forgot the toast size.
Best regards,
--
gurjeet[.singh]@EnterpriseDB.com
singh.gurjeet@{ gmail | hotmail | indiatimes | yahoo }.com
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Mail sent from my BlackLaptop device
Hi,
Le mardi 30 septembre 2008, Heikki Linnakangas a écrit :> pg_relation_size() doesn't include the size of the FSM. Should it? I'mWhat's practical about pg_relation_size() and pg_total_relation_size() as of
> thinking "no", but pg_total_relation_size() should.
8.3 is that the diff is the cumulated indexes storage volume. Your proposal
makes it harder to get this information, but sounds good otherwise.
Would it be possible to add in some new APIs to?
a. pg_relation_size()
b. pg_relation_fsm_size()
c. pg_relation_indexes_size()
d. pg_total_relation_size() = a + b + c
You forgot the toast size.
Best regards,
gurjeet[.singh]@EnterpriseDB.com
singh.gurjeet@{ gmail | hotmail | indiatimes | yahoo }.com
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Mail sent from my BlackLaptop device
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: