Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6578.1347857231@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 09:48:58PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Well, that's even stranger, because (1) information_schema.sql_features >> ought to have a toast table in either version, and (2) neither pg_dump >> nor pg_upgrade ought to be attempting to dump or transfer that table. > I bet pg_upgrade is picking it up from the old cluster because it has an > oid >= FirstNormalObjectId and the table is not in the information > schema. If it *isn't* in information_schema, but is just some random table that happens to be named sql_features, then it's hard to explain why there's anything going wrong at all. My money is on the OP having done a reload of the information_schema (as per, eg, the release notes for 9.1.2), and somehow that's confusing pg_dump and/or pg_upgrade. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: