Re: pg14b1 stuck in lazy_scan_prune/heap_page_prune of pg_statistic
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg14b1 stuck in lazy_scan_prune/heap_page_prune of pg_statistic |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 657425.1623002350@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg14b1 stuck in lazy_scan_prune/heap_page_prune of pg_statistic (Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg14b1 stuck in lazy_scan_prune/heap_page_prune of pg_statistic
Re: pg14b1 stuck in lazy_scan_prune/heap_page_prune of pg_statistic |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com> writes: > On Sun, 6 Jun 2021 at 18:35, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote: >> However, I also found an autovacuum chewing 100% CPU, and it appears the >> problem is actually because autovacuum has locked a page of pg-statistic, and >> every other process then gets stuck waiting in the planner. I checked a few >> and found these: > My suspicion is that for some tuple on that page > HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum() returns HEAPTUPLE_DEAD for a tuple that it > thinks should have been cleaned up by heap_page_prune, but isn't. This > would result in an infinite loop in lazy_scan_prune where the > condition on vacuumlazy.c:1800 will always be true, but the retry will > not do the job it's expected to do. Since Justin's got a debugger on the process already, it probably wouldn't be too hard to confirm or disprove that theory by stepping through the code. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: