Re: Indexes not used in DELETE
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Indexes not used in DELETE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6572.1241737616@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Indexes not used in DELETE (Viktor Rosenfeld <rosenfel@informatik.hu-berlin.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Indexes not used in DELETE
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Viktor Rosenfeld <rosenfel@informatik.hu-berlin.de> writes: > -> Seq Scan on corpus toplevel (cost=0.00..1.39 rows=1 width=54) > Filter: (top_level AND (id = 25::numeric)) > Specifically, I'm wondering why the innermost scan on corpus > (toplevel) does not use the index idx_corpus__toplevel The cost estimate indicates that there are so few rows in corpus that an indexscan would be a waste of time. > and why the > join between corpus (toplevel) and corpus (child) is not a merge join > using the index corpus_pre_key to access the child table. Same answer. Populate the table and the plan will change. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: