Re: delete then insert
От | Ron |
---|---|
Тема | Re: delete then insert |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6557b021-04e9-4c1f-4661-8f063809211c@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: delete then insert (Ken Benson <Ken@infowerks.com>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
From: Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2020 12:12 PM
To: pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: delete then insert
On 1/17/20 2:03 PM, Ken Benson wrote:
So – I THINK I know – that when a row is deleted from a table – the row is not actually removed from the table – but, merely marked as deleted, thus becoming a dead tuple.
AUTOVACUUM – takes care of the process of removing these dead tuples.
My question. If – an insert occurs to that same table before autovacuum comes along, does that inserted record use a dead tuple? Or – does the insert result in an actual added row?
If there's an open transaction which is still looking at the now-deleted record, then over-writing that area of the file would be a Bad Thing.So – the answer is – NO – the dead tuple won’t be used until is has been reclaimed by vacuum – and that it doesn’t because it would be a bad thing, right?
I don't know what happens if not other transaction is holding that "slot".
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: