Re: pg_dump does not dump tables created in information_schema schema
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump does not dump tables created in information_schema schema |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 65539.1633622404@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dump does not dump tables created in information_schema schema ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_dump does not dump tables created in information_schema schema
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes: > On Thursday, October 7, 2021, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote: >> Should tables be allowed to create in "information_schema" schema, if >> yes should the tables/publications be dumped while dumping database >> contents? > I presume you have to be superuser to do this. If so, this would seem to > fit under the “we don’t stop you, but you shouldn’t” advice that we apply > throughout the system, like in say modifying stuff in pg_catalog. > Information_schema is an internal schema attached to an static for a given > release. It is (supposed to be) possible for a superuser to drop information_schema post-initdb and then recreate it by sourcing the information_schema.sql file. In fact, I seem to recall that we've recommended doing so in past minor releases to correct errors in information_schema declarations. So it's fairly hard to see how we could enforce prohibitions against changing information_schema objects without breaking that use-case. On the other hand, just because you did that doesn't mean that you want information_schema to start showing up in your dumps. Quite the opposite in fact, because then you'd have problems with trying to load the dump into a newer PG version that might need different information_schema contents. So I agree: there's nothing to be done here, and the proposed scenario is a case of "superusers should know better than to do that". regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: