Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Un-break pg_dump for the case of zero-column tables.
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Un-break pg_dump for the case of zero-column tables. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6542.1267023174@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Un-break pg_dump for the
case of zero-column tables.
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Un-break pg_dump for the case of zero-column tables. |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: > 2010/2/24 Tom Lane <tgl@postgresql.org>: >> Log Message: >> ----------- >> Un-break pg_dump for the case of zero-column tables. >> >> This was evidently broken by the CREATE TABLE OF TYPE patch. �It would have >> been noticed if anyone had bothered to try dumping and restoring the >> regression database ... > Is there a point in doing that at the end of "make check"? Or as a > separate step on the buildfarm? I think it would make sense to add it as a buildfarm phase, probably after installcheck not check so you still have a working postmaster. I'm not sure how easy it'd be to automate though. What I usually do is make a text dump, restore the dump into an empty DB (watching for errors), dump that, and diff the two dumps. However the expected diff is not empty because of some tests that intentionally stress inheritance column order, and I'm not sure whether it is stable enough to use a simple expected-result comparison. Still, if anyone who knows the buildfarm code cares to try that, I'd be all for it. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: