Re: Re: Re: PITR question
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: Re: PITR question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 654.1097100572@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: PITR question (<simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PITR question
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
<simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote: >>> ... you end up with a core dump (signal 6) and an error saying that you >>> can't stop before end of backup. >> >> Was this corrected? I don't see any followups to it in the archives. >> > Not by me, though I was definitely working on crash recovery then. ;-) > Olivier is right in the explanation of this, but it doesn't seem that a > core dump is the appropriate response. The error is intentional. The reason it's converted to a core dump is simply that the whole of recovery is run as a critical section, and so any fatal error is promoted to PANIC. We could think about a different rule about whether to force a core dump in these circumstances, but I can't say that I am very excited about it. I'd rather have the dump and not need it than vice versa. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: