Re: Writeable CTEs and side effects
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Writeable CTEs and side effects |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6537.1255029119@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Writeable CTEs and side effects (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Writeable CTEs and side effects
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> writes: > On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 12:57 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> I also agree with bumping the CID in between. > Do you mean bump the CID in between each DML statement, or between the > last DML statement and the main query? If the former, how should we > choose the order of execution? I would suggest bumping the CID after each WITH RETURNING query is complete. The order-of-execution issue is a good point, but is there a reason not to do them in the order the WITH clauses appear syntactically? One potentially interesting issue is if RETURNING withs are mixed with plain-SELECT withs. If we stick with the current plan then the plain-SELECTs would execute after the RETURNINGs, which would make things apparently not syntax-order. An easy answer to that one is to insist that all the RETURNING queries appear first. > I'm not sure if this is a problem, but it seems like we're essentially > allowing a complex transaction to take place in one statement. Is that > what we want? Yeah, I think that's more or less the point ... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: