Re: [HACKERS] Protect syscache from bloating with negative cacheentries
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Protect syscache from bloating with negative cacheentries |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6519b7ad-0aa6-c9f4-8869-20691107fb69@BlueTreble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Protect syscache from bloating with negative cacheentries
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/22/17 5:03 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Ok, after reading the code I see I only partly understood what you were >> saying. In any case, it might still be useful to do some testing with >> CATCACHE_STATS defined to see if there's caches that don't accumulate a >> lot of negative entries. > There definitely are, according to my testing, but by the same token > it's not clear that a shutoff check would save anything. Currently they wouldn't, but there's concerns about the performance of some of the other ideas in this thread. Getting rid of negative entries that don't really help could reduce some of those concerns. Or perhaps the original complaint about STATRELATTINH could be solved by just disabling negative entries on that cache. -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com 855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: