Re: Logical Replication WIP
От | Petr Jelinek |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Logical Replication WIP |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 65193a50-6d4b-b5db-8326-daa1f4cfd108@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Logical Replication WIP (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/08/16 09:59, Masahiko Sawada wrote: >>> On 2016-08-05 17:00:13 +0200, Petr Jelinek wrote: >>>> as promised here is WIP version of logical replication patch. >>> > > Thank you for working on this! Thanks for looking! > > I've applied these patches to current HEAD, but got the following error. > > libpqwalreceiver.c:48: error: redefinition of typedef ‘WalReceiverConnHandle’ > ../../../../src/include/replication/walreceiver.h:137: note: previous > declaration of ‘WalReceiverConnHandle’ was here > make[2]: *** [libpqwalreceiver.o] Error 1 > make[1]: *** [install-backend/replication/libpqwalreceiver-recurse] Error 2 > make: *** [install-src-recurse] Error 2 > > After fixed this issue with attached patch, I used logical replication a little. > Some random comments and questions. > Interesting, my compiler does have problem. Will investigate. > The logical replication launcher process and the apply process are > implemented as a bgworker. Isn't better to have them as an auxiliary > process like checkpointer, wal writer? > IMO the number of logical replication connections should not be > limited by max_worker_processes. > What Craig said reflects my rationale for doing this pretty well. > We need to set the publication up by at least CREATE PUBLICATION and > ALTER PUBLICATION command. > Can we make CREATE PUBLICATION possible to define tables as well? > For example, > CREATE PUBLICATION mypub [ TABLE table_name, ...] [WITH options] Agreed, that just didn't make it to the first cut to -hackers. We've been also thinking of having special ALL TABLES parameter there that would encompass whole db. > -- > This patch can not drop the subscription. > > =# drop subscription sub; > ERROR: unrecognized object class: 6102 > Yeah that's because of the patch 0006, I didn't finish all the dependency tracking for the pg_subscription_rel catalog that it adds (which is why I called it PoC). I expect to have this working in next version (there is still quite a bit of polish work needed in general). -- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: