Re: BEFORE UPDATE trigger on postgres_fdw table not work
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BEFORE UPDATE trigger on postgres_fdw table not work |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 65103.1558962137@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BEFORE UPDATE trigger on postgres_fdw table not work (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: BEFORE UPDATE trigger on postgres_fdw table not work
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> writes: > On 2019/05/27 10:52, Shohei Mochizuki wrote: >> I noticed returning a modified record in a row-level BEFORE UPDATE trigger >> on postgres_fdw foreign tables do not work. Attached patch fixes this issue. >> This is because current fdw code adds only columns to RemoteSQL that were >> explicitly targets of the UPDATE as follows. > Yeah. So, the trigger execution correctly modifies the existing tuple > fetched from the remote server, but those changes are then essentially > discarded by postgres_fdw, that is, postgresExecForeignModify(). > ... Also, in the worst case, we'll end > up generating new query for every row being changed, because the trigger > may change different columns for different rows based on some condition. Perhaps, if the table has relevant BEFORE triggers, we should just abandon our attempts to optimize away fetching/storing all columns? It seems like another potential hazard here is a trigger needing to read a column that is not mentioned in the SQL query. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: