Re: Proposal: Implement failover on libpq connect level.
От | PostgreSQL - Hans-Jürgen Schönig |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal: Implement failover on libpq connect level. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 64ED0EEC-49B3-404F-839E-6C0EE5554AFE@cybertec.at обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposal: Implement failover on libpq connect level. (Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposal: Implement failover on libpq connect level.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On 18 Aug 2015, at 11:19, Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at> wrote: > > Hans-Jürgen Schönig wrote: >> in addition to that you have the “problem” of transactions. if you failover in the middle >> of a transaction, strange things might happen from the application point of view. >> >> the good thing, however, is that stupid middleware is sometimes not able to handle >> failed connections. however, overall i think it is more of a danger than a benefit. > > Maybe I misunderstood the original proposal, but my impression was that the alternative > servers would be tried only at the time the connection is established, and there would be no > such problems as you describe. it would still leave the problem of having a read only on the other side unless you are using BDR or so. regards, hans
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: