Re: doc: vacuum full, fillfactor, and "extra space"
От | David Steele |
---|---|
Тема | Re: doc: vacuum full, fillfactor, and "extra space" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 647d6974-9c52-12f0-0418-055b837401b0@pgmasters.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: doc: vacuum full, fillfactor, and "extra space" (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/30/20 6:54 AM, Amit Kapila wrote: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 9:10 PM Peter Eisentraut > <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> >> On 2020-01-20 06:30, Justin Pryzby wrote: >>> Rebased against 40d964ec997f64227bc0ff5e058dc4a5770a70a9 >> >> I'm not sure that description of parallel vacuum in the middle of >> non-full vs. full vacuum is actually that good. > > I have done like that because parallel vacuum is the default. I mean > when the user runs vacuum command, it will invoke workers to perform > index cleanup based on some conditions. > >> I think those sentences >> should be moved to a separate paragraph. > > It seems more natural to me to add immediately after vacuum > explanation, but I might be wrong. After the above explanation, if > you still think it is better to move into a separate paragraph, I can > do that. Peter, do you still think this should be moved into a separate paragraph? Regards, -- -David david@pgmasters.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: