Re: Question on Opteron performance
От | Christopher Petrilli |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Question on Opteron performance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6439E458-72DA-11D8-8B07-003065E15634@amber.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Question on Opteron performance ("Steve Wolfe" <nw@codon.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Question on Opteron performance
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Mar 10, 2004, at 3:14 PM, Steve Wolfe wrote: > Before I shell out the $15k on the 4-way Opteron, I'm going to spend > some long, hard time looking for ways to make the system more > efficient. > However, after all that's already been done, I'm not optimistic that > it's > going to preclude needing the new server. I'm just surprised that > nobody > seems to have used PostgreSQL on a quad-Opteron before! Well, I haven't had a chance to run PostgreSQL on a quad-Opteron box, but in discussing this with someone building a cluster out of them, their experience is that they are seeing better performance out of a quad-Opteron than a 3Ghz Xeon box (quad as well), which they believe reflects superior memory architecture. So, if someone has run on a quad-Xeon of similar "specs", then I would imagine you should see similar, if not better, numbers. Chris -- | Christopher Petrilli | petrilli (at) amber.org
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: