Re: plpgsql and Schemas
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: plpgsql and Schemas |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 6414.1026695974@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | plpgsql and Schemas (Rod Taylor <rbt@zort.ca>) |
| Ответы |
Re: plpgsql and Schemas
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Rod Taylor <rbt@zort.ca> writes:
> I've been running a few functions within schema's. It's annoying that
> everything needs to be qualified as it doesn't allow the functions to be
> moved very easily.
> Would it be appropriate for the function to have it's own schema as
> pre-pended onto the user path while in the users function?
Hmm. I can think of examples where you wouldn't want that (because
the function *should* see the caller's namespace) about as easily
as cases where you would.
If a function wants to access "its own schema", why shouldn't it
use qualified references?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: