Re: psql questions: SQL, progname, copyright dates
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psql questions: SQL, progname, copyright dates |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6403.1094746120@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: psql questions: SQL, progname, copyright dates (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: psql questions: SQL, progname, copyright dates
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > I talked to Greg via chat and it looks like '&' is the best choice for > adding system object display: > \d& shows system stuff Yech, that's awful. It looks ugly and it commandeers a punctuation symbol that we might wish to use for something else someday. I thought the "S" suggestion was much better than this. Personally I am not unhappy with the existing behavior, because (unlike Greg I guess) I use \df and \do to look at system definitions all the time. However I'm willing to accept \dfS on the grounds of symmetry with the behavior for tables. I don't really want to put up with a less convenient behavior *and* a gratuitously different syntax. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: