Re: array_agg() NULL Handling
От | David E. Wheeler |
---|---|
Тема | Re: array_agg() NULL Handling |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 63C3C7B1-5C2A-4EC4-A4F6-856FD2949434@kineticode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: array_agg() NULL Handling (Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Aug 31, 2010, at 11:56 PM, Thom Brown wrote: >>> The first form of aggregate expression invokes the aggregate across all input rows for which the given expression(s)yield non-null values. (Actually, it is up to the aggregate function whether to ignore null values or not —but all the standard ones do.) >> >> -- http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/sql-expressions.html#SYNTAX-AGGREGATES >> >> That, however, is not true of array_agg(): >> >> try=# CREATE TABLE foo(id int); >> CREATE TABLE >> try=# INSERT INTO foo values(1), (2), (NULL), (3); >> INSERT 0 4 >> try=# select array_agg(id) from foo; >> array_agg >> ────────────── >> {1,2,NULL,3} >> (1 row) >> >> So are the docs right, or is array_agg() right? > > I think it might be both. array_agg doesn't return NULL, it returns > an array which contains NULL. No, string_agg() doesn't work this way, for example: select string_agg(id::text, ',') from foo;string_agg ────────────1,2,3 (1 row) Note that it's not: select string_agg(id::text, ',') from foo;string_agg ────────────1,2,,3 (1 row) Best, David
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: