Re: pgsql: Rework the pg_statistic_ext catalog
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: Rework the pg_statistic_ext catalog |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6390.1560707523@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql: Rework the pg_statistic_ext catalog (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql: Rework the pg_statistic_ext catalog
|
Список | pgsql-committers |
Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr> writes: >> This theory is insufficient to explain why Coelho's animals failed, >> though. Maybe it would, if you also posit a ccache screwup? But it's >> not obvious from their configurations that they're using ccache at all. > Indeed, no ccache. The compilers change often (well, once a week), I do > not want anything kept across compiler versions. The animals are really > testing the compilers as much as they are testing postgres. > However, there is an autoconf cache, but I do not see why it would have > such an effect. > So no clue. And now they're both green again, so even less clue. Oh well. On another day I'd be interested to understand exactly what happened there, but right now I lack the time or energy to look closer. (I do still have a suspicion that it was somehow caused by the catversion bumps ...) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: