Re: pg_dumpall + restore = missing view
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dumpall + restore = missing view |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 639.1100913874@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pg_dumpall + restore = missing view (Steve Crawford <scrawford@pinpointresearch.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_dumpall + restore = missing view
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Steve Crawford <scrawford@pinpointresearch.com> writes: > This appears to have all gone well execpt that one view is missing. > I've restored that view by hand but am curious if this is a PG bug or > failure of the nut behind the wheel. > The view involves the union of many tables and its creation failed > because creation of one of the tables does not take place until later > in the dump file. This is a longstanding pg_dump bug: it's not very bright about order of creation of objects. (In this case I surmise that you created the view, and later altered it to reference a table that didn't exist when the view was originally created.) As of 8.0 pg_dump examines dependency information and should theoretically always get this right, but in prior versions it's a real hazard. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: