Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.
От | Anastasia Lubennikova |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 638da278-0bd3-2e10-1a6c-bb2194ffc22e@postgrespro.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | WIP: Covering + unique indexes. (Anastasia Lubennikova <a.lubennikova@postgrespro.ru>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
31.03.2017 20:57, Robert Haas: > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Anastasia Lubennikova > <a.lubennikova@postgrespro.ru> wrote: >> First of all, I want to thank you and Robert for reviewing this patch. >> Your expertise in postgres subsystems is really necessary for features like >> this. >> I just wonder, why don't you share your thoughts and doubts till the "last >> call". > I haven't done any significant technical work other than review > patches in 14 months, and in the last several months I've often worked > 10 and 12 hour days to get more review done. > > I think at one level you've got a fair complaint here - it's hard to > get things committed, and this patch probably didn't get as much > attention as it deserved. It's not so easy to know how to fix that. > I'm pretty sure "tell Andres and Robert to work harder" isn't it. > *off-topic* No complaints from me, I understand how difficult is reviewing and highly appreciate your work. The problem is that not all developers are qualified enough to do a review. I've tried to make a course about postrges internals. Something like "Deep dive into postgres codebase for hackers". And it turned out to be really helpful for new developers. So, I wonder, maybe we could write some tips for new reviewers and testers as well. -- Anastasia Lubennikova Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: