Re: pg_dump without explicit table locking
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump without explicit table locking |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6388.1395064063@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dump without explicit table locking (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_dump without explicit table locking
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes: > 2014-03-17 12:52 GMT+01:00 Jürgen Strobel <juergen+pg@strobel.info>: >> I've googled the problem and there seem to be more people with similar >> problems, so I made this a command line option --no-table-locks and >> wrapped it up in as nice a patch against github/master as I can manage >> (and I didn't use C for a long time). I hope you find it useful. > Joe Conway sent me a tip so commit eeb6f37d89fc60c6449ca12ef9e914 > 91069369cb significantly decrease a time necessary for locking. So it can > help to. Indeed. I think there's zero chance that we'd accept the patch as proposed. If there's still a performance problem in HEAD, we'd look for some other way to improve matters more. (Note that this is only one of assorted O(N^2) behaviors in older versions of pg_dump; we've gradually stamped them out over time.) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: