Re: initdb and fsync
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: initdb and fsync |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6387.1342203584@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: initdb and fsync (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: initdb and fsync
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 07:22:02 PM Jeff Davis wrote: >> Right now I'm inclined to leave the patch as-is. > Fine with that, I wanted to bring it up and see it documented. > I have marked it with ready for committer. That committer needs to decide on - > N in the regression tests or not, but that shouldn't be much of a problem ;) I'm picking up this patch now. What I'm inclined to do about the -N business is to commit without that, so that we get a round of testing in the buildfarm and find out about any portability issues, but then change to use -N after a week or so. I agree that in the long run we don't want regression tests to run with fsyncs by default. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: