Re: Domains and function arguments
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Domains and function arguments |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6362.1055793955@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Domains and function arguments (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Domains and function arguments
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > The SQL standard does not allow functions to have domains as arguments. > Semantically, they have a point. I don't think they do. Declaring a domain as the input type seems a very natural way of asserting that the function only works over a subset of the base input type. For example, log() might usefully be declared to take arguments from a "positivereal" domain. Admittedly, we have trouble resolving the type to use when a function is overloaded with both a domain and a base type, but that's hardly surprising. The present algorithm for ambiguous-function resolution is probably excessively unfriendly to functions with domain inputs: it will match them *only* when they are an exact match (ie, the input argument is already declared or coerced to the domain type). I think that's bowing quite far enough in the direction of the standard; I'd like to loosen it someday, but don't have time to think about it more right now. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: